1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 314 S.E.2d
  5. 314 S.E.2d 556 (1984)
 

STATE v. CUNNINGHAM

No. 8326SC196.

314 S.E.2d 556 (1984)

STATE of North Carolina v. Oger CUNNINGHAM.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 1, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Gen. David E. Broome, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

Asst. Appellate Defender Nora B. Henry, Wilson, for defendant, appellant.

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in permitting the State to cross-examine him about "another robbery," arguing that such questioning "exceeded the scope of permissible cross-examination and [was without] good faith basis."

It has long been the rule that where a defendant in a criminal case testifies in his own behalf, specific acts of misconduct may be brought out on cross-examination to impeach his testimony. [Citations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases