1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 734 F.2d
  5. 734 F.2d 56 (1984)
 

BRANDON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BD. OF PAROLE

No. 83-1100.

734 F.2d 56 (1984)

Roosevelt BRANDON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE, et al.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided May 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew J. Pincus, New York City (Appointed by this Court), with whom Gerald Goldman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Edward E. Schwab, Asst. Corporation Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before WALD and MIKVA, Circuit Judges, and VAN DUSEN, Senior Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.

MIKVA, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Roosevelt Brandon filed a pro se complaint seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief against the District of Columbia Board of Parole (the Board) and its individual members for alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Brandon claimed that the District of Columbia parole process is subject to the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment and that the Board...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases