1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 734 F.2d
  5. 734 F.2d 56 (1984)
 

BRANDON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BD. OF PAROLE

No. 83-1100.

734 F.2d 56 (1984)

Roosevelt BRANDON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE, et al.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided May 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew J. Pincus, New York City (Appointed by this Court), with whom Gerald Goldman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Edward E. Schwab, Asst. Corporation Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before WALD and MIKVA, Circuit Judges, and VAN DUSEN, Senior Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.

MIKVA, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Roosevelt Brandon filed a pro se complaint seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief against the District of Columbia Board of Parole (the Board) and its individual members for alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Brandon claimed that the District of Columbia parole process is subject to the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment and that the Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases