1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 745 F.2d
  5. 745 F.2d 27 (1984)
 

THOMPSON-HAYWARD CHEMICAL CO. v. ROHM AND HAAS CO.

Appeal Nos. 83-981, 83-1017.

745 F.2d 27 (1984)

THOMPSON-HAYWARD CHEMICAL CO., Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. ROHM AND HAAS CO., Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 3, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana M. Raymond, New York City, argued for appellant, cross-appellee. With him on the brief were Arthur S. Tenser and John D. Murnane, New York City, of counsel.

Rudolf E. Hutz, Wilmington, Del., argued for appellee, cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Januar D. Bove, Jr., F.L. Peter Stone and Jeffrey B. Bove, Wilmington, Del.

George W.F. Simmons, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel.

Before RICH, DAVIS, BENNETT, MILLER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

RICH, Circuit Judge.

Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co. (T-H) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, the Honorable Patrick E. Carr, judge, in a patent infringement action by which the patentee, Rohm and Haas Co. (R & H) was awarded $833,121 in damages for infringement (83-981). R & H cross-appeals the amount of the damage award (83-1017).

Appellant T-H has designated certain issues for appeal:...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases