MATTER OF HEARING ON IMMUNITY FOR ETHICS COMPLAINANTS


96 N.J. 669 (1984)

477 A.2d 339

IN THE MATTER OF THE HEARING ON IMMUNITY FOR ETHICS COMPLAINANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 3, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Brennan, III, argued the cause for New Jersey State Bar Association.

August C. Michaelis argued the cause pro se.

Martin Sarver argued the cause pro se.

Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, argued the cause pro se (Irwin I. Kimmelman, attorney; Irwin I. Kimmelman and Michael R. Cole, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; William Harla, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Advocate, argued the cause pro se (Joseph H. Rodriguez, attorney; Richard E. Shapiro, Director, Division of Public Interest Advocacy, on the letter brief).

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Assistant Director, argued the cause for Division of Ethics and Professional Services.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by WILENTZ, C.J.

On January 31, 1984, the Court adopted various rules concerning attorney discipline. One of those rules provides that any grievant in an ethics matter or client in a fee arbitration case shall be absolutely immune from suit for testimony or communications given or made in connection with the fee arbitration or ethics proceeding. The Rule would effectively bar libel and slander suits, for instance, as well as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases