1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 317 S.E.2d
  5. 317 S.E.2d 428 (1984)
 

STATE v. PERRY

No. 836SC1002.

317 S.E.2d 428 (1984)

STATE of North Carolina v. William Mack PERRY and Wesley Perry.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 3, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten, by James Peeler Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Rosbon D.B. Whedbee, Ahoskie, for defendant appellants.

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

We summarily reject defendants' first contention that their arrest warrants and subsequent indictments were issued without probable cause. By pleading and participating in the trial without ever making motions to quash, defendants waived their right to challenge the propriety of the issuance of the warrants and indictments. State v. Teasley, 9 N.C. App. 477, 176 S.E.2d 838

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases