1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 35 Cal.3d
  5. 35 Cal.3d 671 (1984)
 

AMADOR v. UNEMPLOYMENT INS. APPEALS BD.

Docket No. S.F. 24577.

35 Cal.3d 671 (1984)

677 P.2d 224

200 Cal. Rptr. 298

NELLY L. AMADOR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California.

March 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robert John Hughes, Amanda Hawes and Gallardo & Hawes for Plaintiff and Appellant.

George Deukmejian and John K. Van de Kamp, Attorneys General, Charlton G. Holland and Asher Rubin, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BIRD, C.J.

Is a worker disqualified from collecting unemployment insurance benefits when she has been discharged for wilfully refusing to perform work which she reasonably and in good faith believed would jeopardize the health of others?

I.

Nelly Amador appeals from a judgment of the superior court rejecting her petition for a writ of mandate. She sought to compel the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases