1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 314 S.E.2d
  5. 314 S.E.2d 303 (1984)
 

LIVINGSTON v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE

No. 8326SC711.

314 S.E.2d 303 (1984)

Thomas Jay LIVINGSTON, et al, Petitioner-Appellants, v. The CITY OF CHARLOTTE, North Carolina, et al, Respondent-Appellees. In re ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 1182-X, ADOPTED BY the CITY OF CHARLOTTE ON JUNE 3, 1982.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 1, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamel, Hamel & Pearce by Reginald S. Hamel and Hugo A. Pearce, III, Charlotte, for petitioners, appellants.

Henry W. Underhill, Jr., City Atty., and H. Michael Boyd, Deputy City Atty., Charlotte, for respondents, appellees.

HEDRICK, Judge.

By Assignments of Error Nos. 1-4 petitioners contend that the court erred in permitting respondents to file a motion to strike, in granting in principal part this motion, and in excluding evidence at trial relating to the stricken material. These assignments of error relate to allegations in the petition for judicial review that the Charlotte city officials "conspired, improperly and fraudulently, in tampering with the political and quasi-legislative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases