1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 101 Wn.2d
  5. 101 Wn.2d 475 (1984)
 

REINER v. PITTSBURG DES MOINES CORP.

No. 49982-9.

101 Wn.2d 475 (1984)

680 P.2d 55

HARRY REINER, Respondent, v. PITTSBURG DES MOINES CORPORATION, ET AL, Respondents, BURNS & ROE, INC., Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 19, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry P. Abeyta and Abeyta & Nelson, P.S., for petitioner.

Critchlow & Williams, by Eugene G. Schuster and Michael T. Kozlowski, for respondent Reiner.

UTTER, J.

Petitioner, Burns & Roe, Inc. seeks reinstatement of the trial court's dismissal of respondent's suit for his alleged failure to properly serve petitioner with process. We find that the service was adequate and affirm the Court of Appeals.

On August 23, 1978, Harry Reiner was injured while working as a pipefitter at the Hanford Project. He commenced this personal injury action against several defendants, including petitioner Burns & Roe,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases