1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 96 N.J.
  5. 96 N.J. 372 (1984)
 

ACKERT v. KEYSTONE AUTO. INS. CO.

96 N.J. 372 (1984)

476 A.2d 269

JAMES B. ACKERT, GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR AND ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES W. ACKERT, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KEYSTONE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven E. Feld argued the cause for appellant (Schuenmann & Gercke, attorneys).

William Harris Tobolsky argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

Like the companion case of Clendaniel v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co., 96 N.J. 361 (1984), decided today, this matter raises the issue of whether N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10, prior to its amendment in January 1982 by L.1981, c. 533, § 1 required an insurer to make available additional personal injury protection (PIP) benefits for persons other than the named...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases