1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 96 N.J.
  5. 96 N.J. 361 (1984)
 

CLENDANIEL v. NEW JERSEY MFRS. INS. CO.

96 N.J. 361 (1984)

476 A.2d 263

KURT CLENDANIEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Aleli argued the cause for appellant (Steedle, Megargee, Youngblood, Franklin & Corcoran, attorneys).

Gerald J. Neski argued the cause for respondent (Adler, Neski & Garofola, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

This appeal concerns the interpretation of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10 (Section 10) of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (prior to its amendment in January 1982, by L. 1981, c. 533, § 1) (Act). Specifically, the issue here is whether N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10 required the insurer to make available to the named insured additional personal injury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases