BD. OF EDUC., CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX v. LEVITT


197 N.J. Super. 239 (1984)

484 A.2d 723

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. RUTH LEVITT AND ESTHER E. SASLOE, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 29, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis C. Rosen, attorney for appellant and cross-respondent (Dwayne C. Vaughn, on the brief).

Giblin & Giblin, attorneys for respondents and cross-appellants (Michael P. Kemezis and Kenneth M. Bushell, on the brief).

Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, filed a Statement in Lieu of Brief on behalf of New Jersey State Board of Education (Regina A. Murray, Deputy Attorney General, on the statement).

Before Judges PRESSLER, BRODY and HAVEY.


PER CURIAM.

The issue on this appeal is whether the Commissioner of Education is empowered to award post-judgment interest to a successful claimant who has been awarded a money judgment. We find that the Commissioner of Education has that power and accordingly reverse that portion of the State Board of Education's determination denying interest. Otherwise we affirm.

In 1971 petitioners Ruth Levitt and Esther...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases