1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 36 Wn.
  5. 36 Wn. App. 396 (1984)
 

BRILL v. SWANSON

No. 11835-8-I.

36 Wn. App. 396 (1984)

674 P.2d 211

CHARLES A. BRILL, ET AL, Respondents, v. E. GERALD SWANSON, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 9, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Waitt, Johnson & Martens and Richard L. Martens, for appellants.

John P. Lycette, Jr., for respondents.

DURHAM, C.J.

The Swansons appeal the trial court's order granting Brills' motion for summary judgment. The Swansons claim that there were genuine issues of material fact and that the trial court incorrectly interpreted the applicable substantive law. We find no error and affirm.

Appellants Swanson and respondents Brill were the sole stockholders in two Washington corporations, Swabi, Inc. (Swabi) and Brillware Manufacturing Company (Brillware).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases