1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 36 Cal.3d
  5. 36 Cal.3d 330 (1984)
 

RODGERS v. WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD.

Docket No. S.F. 24594.

36 Cal.3d 330 (1984)

682 P.2d 1068

204 Cal. Rptr. 403

ARTHUR RODGERS, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, TRANSCON LINES, INC., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of California.

July 5, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Harry F. Wartnick and Cartwright, Sucherman, Slobodin & Fowler for Petitioner.

Goshkin, Pollatsek, Meredith & Lee, Samuel E. Meredith, Vivian L. Schneider, Mullen & Filippi and John A. Thompson for Respondents.

Clifford D. Sweet III, Heggeness & Sweet, Michael A. Mathews, Mathews & McClain and C. Gordon Taylor as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondents.

OPINION

KAUS, J.

In this workers' compensation matter, petitioner Arthur Rodgers, the employee, contends that the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) used the wrong formula in determining the credit against future workers' compensation payments to which his employer is entitled under Labor Code section 38611 as interpreted in Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers' Comp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases