1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 143 Ariz.
  5. 143 Ariz. 108 (1984)
 

STATE v. LUCERO

No. 6400-PR.

143 Ariz. 108 (1984)

692 P.2d 287

STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Philip Ray LUCERO and Nettie Lucero, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

December 11, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Steven J. Twist, Chief Counsel, Organized Crime and Racketeering Div., and Sherry K. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellant.

Kemper & Henze by James Hamilton Kemper and Stewart & McLean, Ltd. by William H. McLean, Phoenix, for appellees.

CAMERON, Justice.

This is a petition for review of a memorandum decision of Division One of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the trial court's granting of defendants Philip and Nettie Lucero's motion to suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 6, § 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution, A.R.S. § 12-120.24, and Rule 31.19 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.

The only issue raised in the petition for review, Rule 31.19...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases