HASTY v. BROUGHTON

Docket No. 72178.

133 Mich. App. 107 (1984)

348 N.W.2d 299

HASTY v. BROUGHTON

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 21, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rose & Rose (by James M. Rose), for plaintiff.

Kaufman, Payton & Kallas (by Frank S. Spies), for defendant.

Before: D.E. HOLBROOK, JR., P.J., and BRONSON and R.L. TAHVONEN, JJ.


BRONSON, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right a circuit court order dismissing plaintiff's complaint. On November 24, 1982, defendant sold beer to plaintiff, then a minor and visibly intoxicated. After leaving defendant's premises, plaintiff was injured in an auto accident.

Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant on February 11, 1983, under the provisions of the dramshop act, MCL 436.22; MSA 18.993. On June 9, 1983, the circuit court granted accelerated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases