STATE OF MINNESOTA, By its ATTORNEY GENERAL, and Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, and
Northern States Power Company (Minnesota); Northern States Power Company (Wisconsin); Lake Superior District Power Company; Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Intervenors.
STATE OF MINNESOTA, By its ATTORNEY GENERAL, and Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, and
Northern States Power Company (Minnesota) and (Wisconsin) and Lake Superior District Power, Intervenors.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted February 15, 1984.
Decided May 15, 1984.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
George F. Bruder, Bruder & Gentile, Washington, D.C., David A. Lawrence, Law Dept., Northern States Power Company, Minneapolis, Minn., for intervenors Northern States Power Company (Minnesota), Northern States Power Company (Wisconsin), Lake Superior District Power Company.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., State of Minn., Karl W. Sonneman, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., for Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
Stephen R. Melton, Acting General Counsel, Jerome M. Feit, Sol., Robert F. Shapiro, Washington, D.C., for respondent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Before BRIGHT, ARNOLD and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
The State of Minnesota and the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (collectively referred to as the MPUC) petition for review of orders1 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the Commission) approving a proposed amendment to the Coordinating Agreement among the Northern States Power Companies (NSP Companies). The MPUC contends that the Commission lacked jurisdiction to review the proposed amendment because...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
