1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 593 F.Supp.
  5. 593 F.Supp. 1275 (1984)
 

BRENNER v. RECOGNITION EQUIPMENT INC.

No. 82 Civ. 1289 (JES).

593 F.Supp. 1275 (1984)

William BRENNER and Sidney Koslow, Plaintiffs, v. RECOGNITION EQUIPMENT INCORPORATED, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Malone, Michael F. Dennis, Mineola, N.Y., for plaintiffs.

Morgan, Finnegan, Pine, Foley & Lee, New York City, Richards, Harris & Medlock, Dallas, Tex., for defendant; John C. Vassil, New York City, V. Bryan Medlock, Dallas, Tex., of counsel.

OPINION & ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge.

Defendant, Recognition Equipment, Inc. ("REI"), moves pursuant to Rules 50(b) and 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial. After a three day trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs, William Brenner and Sidney Koslow, finding that the patents at issue were valid and infringed by certain equipment manufactured by REI...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases