WHITESIDES HARDWARE v. CITY OF CORVALLIS

No. 83-040; CA A29769.

680 P.2d 1004 (1984)

68 Or.App. 204

WHITESIDES HARDWARE, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, v. CITY OF CORVALLIS, Cross-Respondent, and Heritage Enterprises, a Partnership of Charles F. Kingsley and David F. Wagner, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 9, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen L. Johnson, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner-cross-respondent.

Mary C. Randolph, Eugene, filed the reply brief on cross-appeal for petitioner-cross-respondent.

Robert S. Ball, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. On the brief were Susan M. Quick and Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland.

Richard D. Rodeman, City Atty., Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for cross-respondent.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


GILLETTE, Presiding Judge.

Heritage Enterprises (Heritage) petitions for judicial review of a Land Use Board of Appeals opinion remanding two Corvallis ordinances to the city for reconsideration. Whitesides Hardware, Inc. (Whitesides) cross-petitions, alleging infirmities which LUBA did not find in the ordinances.1

Whitesides was the petitioner before LUBA. The ordinances amend Corvallis' comprehensive plan to approve a regional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases