PERKIN-ELMER CORP. v. COMPUTERVISION CORP.

Appeal No. 83-1195.

732 F.2d 888 (1984)

The PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION, a corporation of New York, Appellee, v. COMPUTERVISION CORPORATION, a corporation of Delaware, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 6, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Birch, Boston, Mass., argued for appellant. With him on brief was James H. Mitchell, Boston, Mass.

Robert M. Taylor, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., argued for appellee. With him on brief were David B. Murphy, Thomas F. Smegal, Jr., and Robert J. Bennett, Los Angeles, Cal.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and DAVIS, BALDWIN, KASHIWA and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.


MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Northern District of California holding valid and infringed claims 1 through 5, 7 and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 3,748,015 ('015 patent), issued to Abe Offner, and claims 1 through 8 of U.S. Patent No. 3,821,763 ('763 patent), issued to Robert M. Scott. Both patents were assigned to The Perkin-Elmer Corporation (Perkin-Elmer). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Perkin-Elmer's "Micralign" was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases