1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 744 F.2d
  5. 744 F.2d 705 (1984)
 

BATES v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASS'N

No. 83-5540.

744 F.2d 705 (1984)

Forest BATES, James Clemons, Howard Hopkins, Roy Howard, Elbert Kelley, James Williams, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and Eagle Marine Services, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 4, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anita Knowlton, Taylor, Roth & Hunt, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Warren Bo Duplinsky, EEOC, Washington, D.C., amicus curiae.

Howard C. Hay, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Costa Mesa, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Before SNEED, KENNEDY, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

Eagle Marine Services, Ltd. (Eagle Marine) appeals from a district court judgment that it must comply with the remedial provisions of a Title VII consent decree. Eagle Marine was not an original party to the consent decree, but replaced one of the original parties at one job site. The district court held Eagle Marine bound by the provisions of the decree under the successorship doctrine. We have jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases