CONKLIN AMUSEMENTS, INC. v. ROSS

No. 84-24.

456 So.2d 972 (1984)

CONKLIN AMUSEMENTS, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Pamela ROSS, a Minor, by and through Her Parents and Next Friends, Jannine Ross and Arthur Ross, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 9, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lanza, Sevier, Womack & O'Connor and Hector J. Lombana, Coral Gables, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Appel & Brown, Greene & Cooper and Joan M. Bolotin, Miami, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Before NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Concluding that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the trial court's grant of a new trial and that, therefore, the appellant has not shown an abuse of discretion, we affirm the order under review. See Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla. 1981); Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell, 384 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1980); Cloud v. Fallis,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases