1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 736 F.2d
  5. 736 F.2d 688 (1984)
 

ROHM & HAAS CO. v. CRYSTAL CHEMICAL CO.

Appeal No. 83-599.

736 F.2d 688 (1984)

ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, Appellee, v. CRYSTAL CHEMICAL COMPANY and Joe C. Eller, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Certiorari Denied October 1, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ned L. Conley, Houston, Tex., argued for appellants. With him on the brief were William E. Shull, Jon E. Hokanson and Jeffrey W. Tayon, Houston, Tex.

Rudolph E. Hutz, Wilmington, Del., argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Januar D. Bove, Jr., F.L. Peter Stone and Jeffrey B. Bove, Wilmington, Del.

George W.F. Simmons, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel.

Before RICH, KASHIWA, MILLER, SMITH and NIES, Circuit Judges.

Certiorari Denied October 1, 1984. See 105 S.Ct. 172.

ORDER

RICH, Circuit Judge.

Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. Eller (hereinafter Crystal), appellants, have filed:

(1) Appellants' Application for Attorney Fees and Expenses Incurred on Appeal Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285. (2) Appellants' Motion for Costs on Appeal Pursuant to FRAP Rule 39 and for Reconsideration of Assessment of Costs.

We consider these two matters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases