1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 449 So.2d
  5. 449 So.2d 954 (1984)
 

WHITE v. KAPLAN

No. 83-1273.

449 So.2d 954 (1984)

Gloria Tarte WHITE and Wallace Hayes, Appellants, v. Neil B. KAPLAN, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pallot, Poppell & Goodman and Neil A. Shanzer, Miami, for appellants.

Neil B. Kaplan in pro per.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Notwithstanding the appellants' not uncogent contention that the law should be otherwise, based on the historical analysis in Watson, Deficiency Suits After Foreclosure: A Matter of Timing, 56 Fla.B.J. 47, 48-50 (1982), it is firmly established that the chancellor's previous denial of a deficiency judgment specifically sought after foreclosure, which was affirmed in White v. Kaplan, 418...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases