1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 744 F.2d
  5. 744 F.2d 640 (1984)
 

HENDERSON v. HUECKER

Nos. 83-2049, 83-2050.

744 F.2d 640 (1984)

Don L. HENDERSON, James E. Nickels, Appellant, Ella D. Peterson, v. Gail HUECKER, Director of the Arkansas Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services; E. Russell Baxter, Commissioner of Rehabilitation Services; R. Lewis Urton, Former Deputy Commissioner of Rehabilitation Services; Vincent H. Bond, Deputy Commissioner of Rehabilitation Services; Ray Eugene Harwood, Administrator, Hot Springs Rehabilitation Center; Richard W. Kuhn, Program Development Services Supervisor, Individually and as agents of the Arkansas Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services — Walter "Buddy" Carmack, Assistant Administrator for Medical Services, Appellees. Don L. HENDERSON and James E. Nickels, Ella D. Peterson, Appellant, v. Gail HUECKER, Director of the Arkansas Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services; E. Russell Baxter, Commissioner of Rehabilitation Services; R. Lewis Urton, Former Deputy Commissioner of Rehabilitation Services; Vincent H. Bond, Deputy Commissioner of Rehabilitation Services; Ray Eugene Harwood, Administrator, Hot Springs Rehabilitation Center; Richard W. Kuhn, Program Development Services Supervisor, Individually and as agents of the Arkansas Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services — Walter "Buddy" Carmack, Assistant Administrator for Medical Services, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided September 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pamela D. Walker, Little Rock, Ark., Benita Terry Jones, Dallas, Tex., John W. Walker, P.A., John W. Walker, Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.

Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., Mary B. Stallcup, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, Ark., for appellee.

Before McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

James E. Nickels and Ella Peterson appeal from a final judgment entered in the District Court for the Western District of Arkansas after a non-jury trial in favor of state rehabilitation services directors, administrators, and supervisors finding that Nickels and Peterson failed to demonstrate that they had been deprived of their first amendment rights of free speech and association. For reversal Peterson argues that the district court erred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases