1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 739 F.2d
  5. 739 F.2d 587 (1984)
 

MILLIKEN RESEARCH CORP. v. DAN RIVER, INC.

Appeal No. 83-727.

739 F.2d 587 (1984)

MILLIKEN RESEARCH CORPORATION, Appellant, v. DAN RIVER, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 5, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tom Arnold, Houston, Tex., argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Jack C. Goldstein, Houston, Tex.

Roger W. Parkhurst and James A. Oliff, Alexandria, Va., of counsel.

Lewis T. Booker, Richmond, Va., and David Rabin, Greensboro, N.C., argued for appellee. With them on the brief were H.H. Huntley and L.A. Goodson, Jr., Danville, Va.

Before SMITH and NIES, Circuit Judges, and KELLAM, Senior District Judge.

NIES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Danville Division (Turk, C.J.), in a patent infringement suit brought by Milliken Research Corporation against Dan River, Inc. for infringement of Milliken's U.S. Patents Nos. 3,254,510 and 3,277,673, to Lesley. The district court held both patents (the Lesley patents) invalid for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We affirm....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases