1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 745 F.2d
  5. 745 F.2d 560 (1984)
 

CINEVISION CORP. v. CITY OF BURBANK

Nos. 83-5606, 83-5730, 83-5949 and 83-6154.

745 F.2d 560 (1984)

CINEVISION CORPORATION, a corporation, Plaintiff, Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BURBANK, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, and Jim Richman, Defendants-Appellees. CINEVISION CORPORATION, a corporation, and Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF BURBANK, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California and Jim Richman, Defendants-Appellants. CINEVISION CORPORATION, a corporation, and Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF BURBANK, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California and Jim Richman, Defendants-Appellants. CINEVISION CORPORATION, a corporation, Plaintiff, Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BURBANK, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, and Jim Richman, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bert Deixler, John W. Cochrane, Manatt, Phelps, Rothenberg & Tunney, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

William B. Rudell, City Atty., Douglas Holland, Asst. City Atty., City of Burbank, Anthony Liebig, Timm A. Miller, Lillick McHose & Charles, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Before SNEED and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Cinevision Corporation entered into a contract with the City of Burbank to promote concerts in a municipally-owned amphitheater. Ostensibly acting pursuant to the terms of the contract, the Burbank City Council rejected six of Cinevision's proposed concerts. Cinevision filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982) against the City and a member of the City Council alleging that the entertainers were denied access to a public forum in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases