Kipp ANDERSON, et al., Petitioners,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FAA, Respondents.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 18, 1984.
May 18, 1984.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Thomas H. Bornholdt, Overland Park, Kan., argued for petitioners.
Robert A. Reutershan, Washington, D.C., argued for respondent. With him on the brief were J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, and Sandra P. Spooner, Asst. Director, Washington, D.C., Diane R. Liff, Asst. Gen. Counsel for Litigation, Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C., of counsel.
Stephen C. Cooper and Steven Z. Cohen, Southfield, Mich., were on the brief for amicus curiae in support of petitioners.
Edward J. Hickey, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Public Employees Dept. AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C., was on the brief as amicus curiae in support of petitioner.
H. Craig Becker, Washington, D.C., was on the brief as amicus curiae in support of petitioner.
Mitchell Notis, Staff Counsel, American Federation of Government Employees, Washington, D.C., was on the brief as amicus curiae in support of petitioners.
Marci B. Seville, Burton F. Boltuch and Jonathan H. Siegel, of counsel, Oakland, Cal., was on the brief as amicus curiae in support of petitioners.
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and FRIEDMAN, RICH, SMITH and NIES, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
NIES, Circuit Judge.
The petitioners of this appeal are former air traffic controllers employed at Olathe Route Air Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) in Olathe, Kansas. As in the related cases decided today, petitioners seek reversal of a decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board (board) upholding the adverse actions taken by the Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration against each of the petitioners.
The petitioners here raise numerous...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.