1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 348 N.W.2d
  5. 348 N.W.2d 913 (1984)
 

AMERADA HESS CORP. v. FURLONG OIL & MINERALS

Civ. No. 10530.

348 N.W.2d 913 (1984)

AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, in its own behalf and as unit operator of the Tioga-Madison Unit, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. FURLONG OIL AND MINERALS COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

April 24, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fleck, Mather, Strutz & Mayer, Bismarck, for plaintiff, appellant and cross-appellee; argued by John Morrison, Bismarck.

Bjella, Neff, Rathert, Wahl & Eiken, Williston, for defendant, appellee and cross-appellant; argued by Vern C. Neff and Charles L. Neff. Appearance by Fred C. Rathert, Williston.

SAND, Justice.

Amerada Hess Corporation appealed from a judgment denying its requested injunction prohibiting Furlong Oil and Minerals Company from using the K-119 well bore and awarding Furlong damages for work stoppages caused by the issuance of a temporary restraining order sought and received by Amerada. Furlong cross-appealed from that portion of the judgment determining that Furlong was not entitled to punitive damages. We affirm in part and remand for further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases