STRICKLAND v. SEIPLE

No. 9354.

680 P.2d 533 (1984)

In the Matter of the Arbitration Between A. Thomas STRICKLAND, Appellee, and Ronald L. SEIPLE, Appellant.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.

April 25, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randolph R. Slaton, Honolulu (Chee, Oshiro, Williams & Slaton, Honolulu, of counsel), for appellant.

Michael L. Freed, Honolulu (Cheryl A. Nakamura, Honolulu, with him on the brief; Hamilton, Gibson, Nickelsen, Rush & Moore, Honolulu, of counsel), for appellee.

Before BURNS, C.J., and HEEN and TANAKA, JJ.


TANAKA, Judge.

This is an appeal from the circuit court's confirmation of an arbitration award. The dispositive issue is whether the arbitration award lacked sufficient definiteness to render it a final award so that the court erred in confirming it. We answer yes and reverse and remand.

A. Thomas Strickland (Strickland) and Ronald L. Seiple (Seiple) formed a partnership1 to purchase and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases