SATTER v. NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION

No. C5-84-861.

358 N.W.2d 731 (1984)

Einer SATTER and Roger Satter, Respondents, v. NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 11, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Morrison Kershner, Rufer, Hefte, Pemberton, Schulze, Sorlie, Sefkow & Kershner, Fergus Falls, for respondents.

William J. Utermohlen, Stohlman, Beuchert, Egan & Smith, Washington, D.C., William P. Scott, Scott & Lucking, Pipestone, for appellant.

Heard, considered, and decided by LANSING, P.J., and HUSPENI and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

National Farmers Organization, Inc. appeals from a judgment allowing respondents Einer and Roger Satter to rescind their contract with NFO, and awarding the Satters damages of $14,197.48. NFO claims that the Satters are not entitled to avoid the contract and that NFO is entitled to its damages. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

The Satters are brothers who farm together. Einer Satter has been a member of the NFO since...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases