BRUNSCO v. NOONAN

Nos. 83-670, 83-2485.

456 So.2d 547 (1984)

BRUNSCO, a Florida Corporation, and Art Bruns, Appellants, v. Karl NOONAN, D/B/a Karl Noonan Realty, Appellee. Karl NOONAN, D/B/a Karl Noonan Realty, Appellant, v. BRUNSCO, a Florida Corporation, and Art Bruns, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 25, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sobel & Sobel and Stuart H. Sobel, Pertnoy & Greenberg, Miami, for Karl Noonan.

Jeanne Heyward, Adams, Hunter, Angones & Adams and Frank Angones, Miami, for Brunsco and Art Bruns.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Noonan, doing business as Karl Noonan Realty, appeals from the trial court's order granting Bruns and Brunsco's motion for relief from judgment on the basis that evidence of Noonan's assignment of his rights to all proceeds received as a result of a successful suit against Bruns and Brunsco constitutes "newly discovered evidence" within the meaning of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). We reverse. Evidence of Noonan's assignment is not material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases