1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 34 Cal.3d
  5. 34 Cal.3d 920 (1983)
 

BATE v. STATE BAR

Docket No. L.A. 31686.

34 Cal.3d 920 (1983)

671 P.2d 360

196 Cal. Rptr. 209

RANDLE H. BATE, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of California.

November 10, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Walter R. Decaen for Petitioner.

Herbert M. Rosenthal, Truitt A. Richey, Jr., Mary A. Tan Yen and Antonia Darling for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

Petitioner Randle Bate was admitted to the practice of law in California in 1969, and has no prior disciplinary record. In October 1980, the State Bar charged petitioner with wilfully misappropriating monies entrusted to him by two separate clients. The State Bar Review Department recommends that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years and that execution of suspension be stayed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases