STATE v. NEAL

No. 8221SC595.

299 S.E.2d 654 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Vernerd NEAL.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

January 18, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Daniel F. McLawhorn, Raleigh, for the State.

Jenkins, Lucas, Babb & Rabil by S. Mark Rabil, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.


BRASWELL, Judge.

From ten assignments of error the defendant brings forth one argument. He contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for appropriate relief of a new trial for the sole reason that at the conclusion of a prior jury trial in the same week of court, the trial judge commented upon the verdict to the members of the jury, three of whom later became empanelled as jurors in the present case. Defendant contends that the judge's comments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases