1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 661 P.2d
  5. 661 P.2d 279 (1983)
 

GRODITSKY v. PINCKNEY

Nos. 82SA171, 82SA172.

661 P.2d 279 (1983)

Walt GRODITSKY, et al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. Darrell PINCKNEY, Respondent-Appellant, v. Floyd SACK, et al., Protestants-Appellants. Walt GRODITSKY, et al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. Thomas YOUNG, Respondent-Appellant, v. Floyd SACK, et al., Protestants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

April 4, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raule G. Nemer, Denver, for petitioners-appellees.

Calkins, Kramer, Grimshaw & Harring, Charles E. Norton, James S. Bailey, Jr., Denver, for respondents-appellants.

NEIGHBORS, Justice.

This is a consolidated appeal of the decision made by the district court sustaining petitions for the recall of the respondents and upholding the constitutionality of the statutory scheme providing for the recall of special district directors.1 We affirm.

I.

On March 5, 1982, petitions demanding the recall of Darrell Pinckney and Thomas Young (respondents) from their positions as directors of the Bancroft...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases