BOHRER v. HANES CORP.

No. 82-1314.

715 F.2d 213 (1983)

Paul BOHRER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HANES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

September 23, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James & Harkavy, Norman B. Smith, Jonathan R. Harkavy, Greensboro, N.C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Groce, Locke & Hebdon, J. Michael Myers, John J. Franco, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Before POLITZ and JOLLY, Circuit Judges, and STAGG, District Judge.


POLITZ, Circuit Judge:

Paul Bohrer brought suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., alleging that defendants Hanes Corporation and its division, Hanes Hosiery, Inc.,1 had reduced his sales territory2 and later terminated his employment because of age. A jury returned a special verdict finding that age was a determinative factor in Bohrer's discharge, that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases