Husband appeals the denial of his motion to set aside a marriage dissolution decree after his default. The motion was based on lack of personal jurisdiction because of improper service of process and, in the alternative, on the fact that his default resulted from "mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect" under former ORS 18.160 (repealed by Or. Laws 1981, ch. 898, § 53).
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF DHULST
No. D8004-63328; CA A22479.
657 P.2d 231 (1983)
61 Or.App. 383
In the matter of the Marriage of Charlene K. DHULST, Respondent, and James E. Dhulst, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted May 10, 1982.
Decided January 19, 1983.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Warren C. Deras, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Nick Chaivoe, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was James F. O'Rourke, Jr., Portland.
Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
