CRAFTSMAN TYPE, INC. v. LINDLEY

No. 82-1665.

6 Ohio St. 3d 82 (1983)

CRAFTSMAN TYPE, INC., APPELLANT, v. LINDLEY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 27, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Cross & Turner and Mr. Emerson R. Keck, for appellant.

Mr. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Mr. James C. Sauer, for appellee.


LOCHER, J.

Appellant's rationale for seeking the reversal of the Board of Tax Appeals' decision is tripartite. First, appellant asserts that the operation of the principle of expressio unius est exclusio alterius (expression of one thing implies exclusion of another) removes the transfer of reproduction proofs from the definition of taxable "sales" set forth in R.C. 5739.01(B). Secondly, appellant argues that no tax liability has accrued as its customers purchase...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases