PER CURIAM.
Where there was some evidence that appellant was the owner of the vessel which, due to its negligent operation, caused appellee's injuries, and appellant, defending on the grounds that it was only an agent for the principal, willfully refused to comply with the court's order to produce documents disclosing the identity of the owner, it was proper to strike the defense and enter judgment for appellee. See Watson v. Peskoe,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.