1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 123 Misc.2d
  5. 123 Misc.2d 529 (1983)
 

MTR OF TAINES v. BARRY PHOTO

123 Misc.2d 529 (1983)

In the Matter of Harold Taines, Petitioner, v. Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc., Respondent. Harold Taines, Plaintiff, v. Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County.

December 29, 1983

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon (Jay F. Gordon and David H. Wollins of counsel), for petitioner-plaintiff. Finley, Jumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley & Casey (Jerome Kowalski and Ronald D. Hariri of counsel), for defendant-respondent.

ARTHUR W. LONSCHEIN, J.

These consolidated matters concern the early history of Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc. (hereinafter the corporation). This corporation was organized under the laws of New York by three Californians; the petitioner-plaintiff Hal Taines, Gene Barry, and Michael Rafton, who became equal shareholders. Their intent was to exploit a revolutionary one-hour photo-finishing process,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases