PER CURIAM.
In the above entitled matter we ordered a new sentencing hearing in accordance with the provisions of C.Cr.P. art. 894.1. The trial judge has petitioned the court to recall and vacate our order on the grounds that Art. 894.1 had not been enacted into law at the time defendant was sentenced.
The resentencing of defendant was based on the merits of defendant's writ application. The court's previous order,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.