SARDINO v. JUDICIAL COMM.


58 N.Y.2d 286 (1983)

In the Matter of J. Richard Sardino, as Judge of the City Court, City of Syracuse, Petitioner, v. State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 24, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Sonneborn and Richard D. Grossman for petitioner.

Gerald Stern and Robert Straus for respondent.

Joseph E. Fahey, Edward Z. Menkin, Emil M. Rossi, Jack Schultz and Morrell Southwick for Onondaga County Bar Association, amicus curiae.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS concur in Per Curiam opinion.


Per Curiam.

The State Commission on Judicial Conduct has determined that petitioner, a Judge of the Syracuse City Court, engaged in various acts of misconduct demonstrating a pattern of injudicious behavior rendering him unfit to remain in judicial office. Pursuant to the State Constitution, petitioner commenced this proceeding to review the commission's findings of fact, legal rulings and determination that he be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases