SHOCKEY v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 1 CA-IC 2947.

140 Ariz. 113 (1983)

680 P.2d 823

Rita F. SHOCKEY, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Ameron, Respondent Employer, Ameron, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Reconsideration Denied February 22, 1984.

Review Denied May 10, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennings, Strouss & Salmon by Steven C. Lester, Phoenix, for petitioner.

Jones, Skelton & Hochuli by Calvin Harris, Phoenix, for respondent employer and respondent carrier.

Sandra Day, Chief Counsel, Industrial Com'n of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.


OPINION

MEYERSON, Presiding Judge.

Four issues are raised in this special action review of an Industrial Commission decision upon review which reversed an award for continuing benefits:

1. Whether the failure of the administrative law judge (judge) to render a decision upon review within sixty days pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-943.F. (Supp. 1983) left the judge without jurisdiction to enter the decision upon review. 2. Whether the decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases