1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 34 Cal.3d
  5. 34 Cal.3d 215 (1983)
 

PEOPLE v. MOORE

Docket No. Crim. 22852.

34 Cal.3d 215 (1983)

666 P.2d 419

193 Cal. Rptr. 404

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FRANK MOORE, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

August 1, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rosana M. Selesnick, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

George Deukmejian, and John K. Van de Kamp, Attorneys General, Robert H. Philibosian, Chief Assistant Attorney General, S. Clark Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Edward T. Fogel, Jr., and Mark Alan Hart, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

BROUSSARD, J.

This appeal presents the question whether a probation department has a duty to preserve and disclose a urine sample when that sample is used as the basis for revocation of probation. (1a) We hold that the department, having requested a revocation hearing based on the test results of a urine sample, has a duty to preserve and disclose the sample even in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases