EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE

Nos. 80-5694, 80-5700.

698 F.2d 1029 (1983)

EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 10, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey M. Vesely, Los Angeles, Cal., for Employment Development Dept. and Franchise Tax Bd.

David Epstein, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Postal Service.

Before SCHROEDER and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

At issue is whether California state agencies may use California summary tax collection procedures to reach funds in the hands of the United States Postal Service. The district court consolidated these two cases involving similar facts and legal questions but different statutes, and granted summary judgment for the Postal Service. In both cases, California state taxing authorities sought to utilize administrative collection procedures resembling garnishment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases