UNITED STATES v. ECHEVERRY

No. 81-1630.

719 F.2d 974 (1983)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Claret ECHEVERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided January 31, 1983.

Order October 4, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel H. Smith, Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellant.

David Marshal, Asst. U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, TUTTLE and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


The opinion, 698 F.2d 375, is modified by adding the following paragraphs:

The trial judge did give to the jury a single general instruction that their verdict had to be unanimous. This court has held that in a routine case when a jury is presented with multiple counts or schemes, it may be possible to protect the defendant's right to an unanimous jury verdict by such a general instruction. See United States v. Ferris,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases