SIDNEY-VINSTEIN v. A.H. ROBINS CO.

No. 81-4118.

697 F.2d 880 (1983)

Gail SIDNEY-VINSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross Appellee v. A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, Hugh J. Davis, Irwin S. Lerner, Defendants-Appellees and Pee Wee Molding Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided January 28, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven J. Brewer, Conklin, Davids & Friedman, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant-cross appellee.

Thomas W. Kemp, Barbara L. Gately, Washburn & Kemp, San Francisco, Cal., argued, Kevin Dunne, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, San Francisco, Cal., on brief, for defendants-appellees.

Before WISDOM and MERRILL, Senior Circuit Judges, and CHOY, Circuit Judge.


WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

This is a diversity case. It involves negligence and products liability, and other claims arising out of injuries the plaintiff, Gail Sidney-Vinstein, suffered in 1973 through the use of the Dalkon Shield, an intrauterine contraceptive device (I.U.D.). She filed her complaint in November 1979, and the district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on December 10, 1980, relying on California's one-year statute of limitations for tort...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases