1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 653 S.W.2d
  5. 653 S.W.2d 908 (1983)
 

WARFORD v. BEARD

No. 07-81-0181-CV.

653 S.W.2d 908 (1983)

J. Albert WARFORD and Joanne Stevens, Appellants, v. Frank BEARD and Allyne Beard, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

May 25, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nelson & Nelson, Jack O. Nelson, Jr., Lubbock, Goodsill, Anderson & Quinn, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellants.

O'Shea & Hall, W. Richard Forcum, Turner & Jones, Tommy J. Turner, Lubbock, for appellees.

Before REYNOLDS, C.J., and DODSON and COUNTISS, JJ.

COUNTISS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying a Rule 215a1 motion to require two deponents to answer certain questions and produce certain documents. The trial court concluded the deponents were entitled to rely on their privilege against self-incrimination in refusing to answer the questions or produce the documents. We reverse and remand.

The case before us is part of the continuing controversy outlined in Warford...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases