1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 706 F.2d
  5. 706 F.2d 813 (1983)
 

DANZL v. N. ST. PAUL-MAPLEWOOD-OAKDALE IND. SCH.

No. 82-1688.

706 F.2d 813 (1983)

Agnes A. DANZL, Appellee, v. NORTH ST. PAUL-MAPLEWOOD-OAKDALE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 622; Dr. Carl Midjaas, individually and in his capacity as Director, Personnel and Management Services for North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Independent School District No. 622; Dr. Richard St. Germain, individually and in his capacity as Director of Secondary Education for North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Independent School District No. 622; North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Independent School District No. 622 School Board; Bette Jayne Haak, individually and in her capacity as School Board member; T. Geron Bell, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; Bruce L. Beck, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; William Lester, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; G. Paul Sandberg, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; Charles W. Wiger, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; and Robert Hansen, individually and in his capacity as School Board member, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided May 4, 1983.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied June 30, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oakes & Kanatz by Judith L. Oakes, Viola M. Kanatz, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.

Peterson, Popovich, Knutson & Flynn by Thomas M. Sipkins, Peter S. Popovich, St. Paul, Minn., for appellants.

Before ROSS, FAGG, Circuit Judges, and SCHATZ, District Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 30, 1983.

FAGG, Circuit Judge.

Once again we are asked to determine whether the North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Independent School District discriminated on the basis of sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, when it did not hire Agnes Danzl to fill a one-year high school principal position. The district court1 found that the school district's articulated nondiscriminatory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases