1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 706 F.2d
  5. 706 F.2d 768 (1983)
 

OVERBEE v. VAN WATERS & ROGERS

No. 81-3521.

706 F.2d 768 (1983)

Isaac OVERBEE, Jr. and Betty S. Overbee, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VAN WATERS & ROGERS, A DIVISION OF UNIVAR CORPORATION, and Univar, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided May 10, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard K. Bauer (argued), O'Brien & Bauer Co., Findlay, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants.

M. Donald Carmin (argued), Eastman, Stichter, Smith & Bergman, Toledo, Ohio, for defendants-appellees.

Before LIVELY and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment, entered on a jury verdict in the Northern District of Ohio, holding for defendants-appellees, Van Waters & Rogers, a division of Univar Corporation and Univar, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Van Waters & Rogers) in this products liability action instituted by plaintiffs-appellants, Isaac Overbee, Jr. (Overbee), and his wife, Betty S. Overbee.

A review of the record reveals the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases