HUTCHISON v. ARO CORP.


653 S.W.2d 738 (1983)

Ruth A. HUTCHISON and G.C. Hutchison, Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. ARO CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Nashville.

March 25, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerry C. Colley, Columbia, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Donald J. Ray, Tullahoma, John T. Bobo, Shelbyville, for defendant-appellee.


NEARN, Presiding Judge, Western Section.

An attempt has been made to appeal to this Court as a matter of right under Rule 4, Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. The appeal is not one of right, is premature and we must dismiss same without prejudice.

At the close of plaintiffs' proof the defendant made a motion for a directed verdict based upon an alleged failure of plaintiffs' proof. The Trial Judge at that time denied the motion. The defendant stood on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases